Monday, September 30, 2019

Digital Possibilities...

Photo from FilmAffinity.com
The possibilities are seemingly endless when it comes to Movies and Television.  A seed of an idea can turn into something that in many ways could be seen as truly terrifying.  Black Mirror has a way of turning what seems relatively harmless into a frightening reality that seems truly possible in the not so distant future.

This particular episode of the show is titled "Be Right Back."  The cast, like most episodes of the show, is stellar.  I initially watched this episode while I was reading Frankenstein and writing a paper about adaptations.  I ended up not using it for the paper, but it's one of those episodes that is really hard to forget.  It's so timely and very disconcerting to think about how technology and science are close to making this type of thing a reality.  Even if it's morally and ethically wrong to do it, there is still that little seed that's planted that allows for the "what it" thought that is hard to get rid of.

This brief summary is from FilmAffinity.com.
Hayley Atwell plays Martha, whose boyfriend Ash (Domhnall Gleeson) is a "social media addict." They decide to move to a cottage in the middle of nowhere, but then Ash is killed returning the moving van. At the funeral, Martha's friend Sarah (Sinead Matthews) tells her that they can create a real-seeming version of Ash out of all his previous social media updates. At first, Martha is grossed out, but eventually she goes along with it — and then she discovers she's pregnant. And she decides to write back to one of the emails she's gotten from the artificial, posthumous version of Ash.


The idea really is terrifying, but it's easy to see how someone who is mourning the death of a loved one could be tempted by the idea.  We put so much information out the into the digital world that it's easy to see how with the right technology it could be gathered to recreate our lives once we are gone.  This episode takes it a step further by creating an exact replica of his body as well.  Martha does discover that there is something missing from this form that looks, speaks, and acts like Ash.  What technology can't replicate in this case is human feeling and emotion. 

This is a little like the concept of presence and absence that Katherine Hayles writes about in Chapter 2 of How We Became Posthuman.  She writes, "Questions about presence and absence do not yield much leverage in this situation, for the avatar both is and is not present, just as the user both is and is not inside the screen" (27).  She's using it in a different situation, but to tie it back to this episode of the show, Ash is living so much of his life online that this company was able to recreate his life after his death with those bits he shared/stored in the cloud.  His mind and body are absent, but so much of his life is still present.

It's a little scary to think that all those little bits and pieces we share online are being stored somewhere; once we hit send or post, they are out there and we can't take them back.  Our lives are no longer our own once we decide to have an online presence.  We may be years away from this technology, but it's also entirely possible that this is something that could happen very soon.  Think about that the next time you send a photo, a text, pay a bill, or tell someone Happy Birthday on Facebook.

4 comments:

  1. Shelly,

    It's crazy that you mention the idea of what we put out on the internet never really going away. I just had the conversation with my students yesterday about how Snapchat really doesn't get rid of their pictures and that if they are caught sending inappropriate pictures that is a felony......*insert face palm emoji here* But I agree, it is creepy to think that everything that is digitally out there is stored somewhere and "could be" accessed if need be. It makes me feel very small in the grand scheme of things. And it makes my brain hurt - LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not going to lie... all this talk about The Black Mirror is really making me want to watch it. I keep asking myself what I would do if I were in her shoes; I wonder if I would be tempted too.

    This post goes directly back to our conversation in class on Monday -- true human emotions cannot be replicated. We discussed what it meant to be human and many of us felt it had a lot to do with emotions. Whether we like it or not, we are emotional creatures and I do not believe that machines have the capability of "feeling" the way we do... or at least not yet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One of our essay questions for Frankenstein is, "What are the ethical limits of science." However, since science and technology are so closely intertwined, this could easily be "What are the ethical limits of technology?" In this case, I'm not sure that recreating a loved one based on the information swarming around the internet about said loved one is particularly ethical. At some point, humans are never going to know when to let go because loved ones could, theoretically, live on forever, but in an emotionless form. I'm not sure how that could be particularly comforting for the loved ones; it could just further their pain, especially as the replica remains emotionally distant. At some point, humans need to know how to let go, which is, honestly, not possible with the swirling soup of past information that is the internet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is Anna (Barr) Olson, by the way. The swirling soup of the internet couldn't figure out my name. Maybe there is hope!

      Delete